<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for David Ocamb</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidocamb.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidocamb.com</link>
	<description>Experienced Dallas-Ft. Worth Public Affairs Professional and Political Consultant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 19:25:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Science of Mudslinging: Why Negative Political Ads Work by Going Negative: Push Your Opponent to the Extreme &#124; David Ocamb</title>
		<link>http://davidocamb.com/2010/04/the-science-of-mudslinging/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Going Negative: Push Your Opponent to the Extreme &#124; David Ocamb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 19:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidocamb.com/?p=37#comment-43</guid>
		<description>[...] As I’ve already discussed, it is vital to engage in negative messaging.  However, public affairs campaigns often face a seemingly insurmountable obstacle… how do you push back against a cause that has overwhelming public support?  When an issue advocacy group is defending a position that has 80% public approval, how can you possibly attack it?  The simple answer is… don’t attack it!  One very effective technique is to not directly attack their position but instead to push that group to the absolute extreme and reframe the debate attacking the group for holding an extreme position.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As I’ve already discussed, it is vital to engage in negative messaging.  However, public affairs campaigns often face a seemingly insurmountable obstacle… how do you push back against a cause that has overwhelming public support?  When an issue advocacy group is defending a position that has 80% public approval, how can you possibly attack it?  The simple answer is… don’t attack it!  One very effective technique is to not directly attack their position but instead to push that group to the absolute extreme and reframe the debate attacking the group for holding an extreme position.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Building a Brand: How Positive Messaging Can Win Elections by The Myth of Messaging &#124; David Ocamb</title>
		<link>http://davidocamb.com/2010/04/building-a-brand/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>The Myth of Messaging &#124; David Ocamb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 16:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidocamb.com/?p=70#comment-24</guid>
		<description>[...] previously discussed the importance of building a strong brand for political campaigns as well as for issue advocacy and corporate brands.  In terms of the campaign narrative, this brand [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] previously discussed the importance of building a strong brand for political campaigns as well as for issue advocacy and corporate brands.  In terms of the campaign narrative, this brand [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Have Another Blog? by Ward</title>
		<link>http://davidocamb.com/2010/03/why-have-another-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 05:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidocamb.com/?p=25#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Well played sir, keep it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well played sir, keep it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Building a Brand: How Positive Messaging Can Win Elections by Branding and Public Affairs &#124; David Ocamb</title>
		<link>http://davidocamb.com/2010/04/building-a-brand/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Branding and Public Affairs &#124; David Ocamb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidocamb.com/?p=70#comment-10</guid>
		<description>[...] I’ve previously stated, a strong political brand is priceless for candidates running for elected office.  The same [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I’ve previously stated, a strong political brand is priceless for candidates running for elected office.  The same [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Science of Mudslinging: Why Negative Political Ads Work by Going Negative: Play to Your Opponent’s Strengths &#124; David Ocamb</title>
		<link>http://davidocamb.com/2010/04/the-science-of-mudslinging/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Going Negative: Play to Your Opponent’s Strengths &#124; David Ocamb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 20:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidocamb.com/?p=37#comment-8</guid>
		<description>[...] greatest return on investment in terms of the number of people persuaded for every dollar spent (See my previous post for further discussion).  However, not all negative messaging is created equally.  It is important to study the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] greatest return on investment in terms of the number of people persuaded for every dollar spent (See my previous post for further discussion).  However, not all negative messaging is created equally.  It is important to study the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CONSUMER ALERT: Dental Fraud on the Rise by David</title>
		<link>http://davidocamb.com/2010/03/consumer-alert-dental-fraud-on-the-rise/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 20:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidocamb.com/?p=28#comment-6</guid>
		<description>It actually wasn&#039;t a chain. But your question does bring up the very important point... this sort of abuse is widespread. 

Also agreed on other forms of medicine having the same problems with wasteful overhead and outright fraud and abuse. In an ideal world, the marketplace would be able to eliminate these people. However, as seen in industry after industry, it sometimes fails in doing so. This is where governments step in to regulate and ensure consumers are protected. 

Healthcare is even more fraught with risk if the government doesn&#039;t regulate. First, consumers are not educated in this highly technical field. Even more bothersome, consumers trust doctors and health care professionals in a way they&#039;d never trust a plumber or car mechanic (two other highly specialized fields). Second, in many cases the consumer doesn&#039;t pay for the treatment... insurance companies do. 

Well, one might argue, insurance companies have an incentive to regulate. The problem with that is that their incentive is to spend as little money as possible without angering consumers so much that they leave in large numbers (particularly healthy ones). So a) they are not looking out for people&#039;s best health and economic interest b) they might let some waste continue to increase satisfaction of relatively healthy patients. 

So, this is why government regulation is especially important in this area. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It actually wasn&#8217;t a chain. But your question does bring up the very important point&#8230; this sort of abuse is widespread. </p>
<p>Also agreed on other forms of medicine having the same problems with wasteful overhead and outright fraud and abuse. In an ideal world, the marketplace would be able to eliminate these people. However, as seen in industry after industry, it sometimes fails in doing so. This is where governments step in to regulate and ensure consumers are protected. </p>
<p>Healthcare is even more fraught with risk if the government doesn&#8217;t regulate. First, consumers are not educated in this highly technical field. Even more bothersome, consumers trust doctors and health care professionals in a way they&#8217;d never trust a plumber or car mechanic (two other highly specialized fields). Second, in many cases the consumer doesn&#8217;t pay for the treatment&#8230; insurance companies do. </p>
<p>Well, one might argue, insurance companies have an incentive to regulate. The problem with that is that their incentive is to spend as little money as possible without angering consumers so much that they leave in large numbers (particularly healthy ones). So a) they are not looking out for people&#8217;s best health and economic interest b) they might let some waste continue to increase satisfaction of relatively healthy patients. </p>
<p>So, this is why government regulation is especially important in this area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CONSUMER ALERT: Dental Fraud on the Rise by McBlogger</title>
		<link>http://davidocamb.com/2010/03/consumer-alert-dental-fraud-on-the-rise/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>McBlogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidocamb.com/?p=28#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Was this a Castle Dental by chance:)?

Yeah, some of the larger dental companies have become a super scam. But it&#039;s no different than anything else in medicine. My GP likes to send me to a lab for bloodwork he has an interest in. When I finally asked him to refer me to another lab, he acted kind of indignant and I got to explain RESPA to him. 

Bottom line, if I can&#039;t self deal in my business, you can&#039;t in yours and I don&#039;t give a flying fuck how long you went to goddamn school.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was this a Castle Dental by chance:)?</p>
<p>Yeah, some of the larger dental companies have become a super scam. But it&#8217;s no different than anything else in medicine. My GP likes to send me to a lab for bloodwork he has an interest in. When I finally asked him to refer me to another lab, he acted kind of indignant and I got to explain RESPA to him. </p>
<p>Bottom line, if I can&#8217;t self deal in my business, you can&#8217;t in yours and I don&#8217;t give a flying fuck how long you went to goddamn school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Have Another Blog? by Dorene</title>
		<link>http://davidocamb.com/2010/03/why-have-another-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidocamb.com/?p=25#comment-4</guid>
		<description>zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Have Another Blog? by David</title>
		<link>http://davidocamb.com/2010/03/why-have-another-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidocamb.com/?p=25#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Thanks RB.  I&#039;ve certainly participated in the blogging world in the past as part of a few political blogging communities and even as a front page poster, but that was all within the context of a blog with a certain angle/perspective/objective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks RB.  I&#8217;ve certainly participated in the blogging world in the past as part of a few political blogging communities and even as a front page poster, but that was all within the context of a blog with a certain angle/perspective/objective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Have Another Blog? by RB</title>
		<link>http://davidocamb.com/2010/03/why-have-another-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>RB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidocamb.com/?p=25#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Welcome to the Blogging world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the Blogging world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

